Welcome Creators !!
Our Submission are open throughout the year:
|Issue:2.1 March 2020||
Last Day Of The Month
|Issue 2.2 June 2020||
Last Day Of The Month
|Issue 2.3 September 2020||
Last Day Of The Month
|Issue 2.4 December 2020||
Last Day Of The Month
Limits for Submission
at a time
From 1000 to 7500
Submit your work@
Literature, Language, Education.
What do we Publish?
We do not discriminate one form or writing from the other. We publish Nonfiction, Fiction, Poetry, hybrid, cross-genre and also if you have invented something new. you are bound to the policy of the journal that the submission is original and does not contain any plagiarized material.
All submissions are read blind. So do not write any credentials in the attached file. A nice cover letter as the body of email is recommended but not necessary.
We publish Fiction which captivates with its intriguing language and characters. Absurd and jabberwocky has a special place. Flash fiction, hybrid, shouts, and cross-genres are welcome. Keep them below 750 words.
We publish nonfiction on a variety of topics, in a variety of voices, from a variety of perspectives. We only review completed manuscripts; please send only finished work.
We welcome both emerging and established poets for our journal on the following ground:
- Poetry must not contain obscene and abusive words but it can be inventory if it is.
- Poetry should not deliberately insult the sentiments of a religious community or invokes terrorism.
Please read these guidelines in their entirety.
- We accept only electronic submissions.
- Please one submission at a time, no multiple submissions.
- Simultaneous submissions are acceptable, as long as you immediately notify the editors that your piece has been accepted elsewhere.
- With rare exceptions, writers are not compensated.
- We are interested in every sort of longform, original, narrative unpublished or previously published(if you are the right owner) manuscripts.
- Should your work be published in a collection at some later date, we’d appreciate the standard acknowledgment.
Format of Articles
- Author’s affiliation (Author Name, Department, College, State, Country, Mobile Number and E-Mail should be provided)
- The Abstract should not be more than 400 words
- About 3 to 6 keywords should be provided.
- Heading and subheading should be numbered.
- Material and Methods
The reference number should follow the following format:-
For Journals Format:
Author(s) of article (surname initials). Title of the manuscript. Journal title abbreviated Year of publication; volume number (issue number): page numbers.
Standard journal article (If more than six authors, the first six shall be listed followed by et al.)
Amit G Ramteke, Sanjay R Singh. Treatment of social relationships in Francis Scott Fitzgerald’s novels. International Journal of English Research. 2016; 2(2):22-24.
Authors involving in the usage of experimental animals and human subjects in their research article should seek approval from the appropriate Ethical committee in accordance with “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care”. The Method section of the manuscript should include a statement to prove that the investigation was approved and that informed consent was obtained.
Role of Editors:
The role of the editors is to evaluate the suitability of submitted manuscripts for the journal, including: (a) the quality of the manuscript, (b) whether it meets the Aims and Scope of the journal, and (c) the originality of the work. The editors will not disclose information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers or potential reviewers, or other members of the editorial board. Editors will ensure the prompt handling of the review process. Editors will evaluate the merit of manuscripts for intellectual content without regard to race, gender, country of origin, ethnicity, religion, or sexual orientation.
Role of Reviewers:
Peer review is essential to the journal in assisting in making editorial decisions and assisting authors in manuscript improvement. Reviewers should point out relevant publications not cited in the manuscript and point out any similarities with previously published works. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts with conflicts of interest, competitive, financial, or collaborative. If a potential reviewer feels unqualified to review the manuscript, that reviewer should notify the editors immediately and decline the review. Manuscripts received for review will be treated as confidential documents and not shown or discussed with other without authorization from the editors. Authors should expect to receive reviewer reports in a prompt manner, normally within three weeks. Reviewer misconduct (breach of confidentiality, delay of peer review, plagiarism, or conflicts of interest) will not be tolerated.
Role of Authors:
Authors of original research (not previously published or under consideration for publication elsewhere) should be an accurate presentation of the work carried out, a discussion of the significance of the work in context with previous works, and should contain sufficient experimental detail to allow others to replicate the work. Appropriate citation of previously published works must always be included. Authors should disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that may be construed as influencing the data or interpretation. All sources of financial support should be disclosed. Authorship should be limited to those persons who have made a significant contribution to the work in terms of conception, design, experimental implementation, and data analysis and interpretation. All persons making significant contributions should be included as co-authors. If an author discovers a significant error in the published work, the author is obligated to inform the journal editor in order to either correct or retract the paper.
Role of the Publisher:
In cases of proven scientific misconduct, plagiarism, or fraudulent publication, the publisher, in collaboration with the editorial board, will take appropriate action to clarify the situation, publish an erratum, or retract the work in question.
Instructions to Reviewer
Criteria for Reviewing: Reviewers could judge any manuscript on the basis of following criteria:
- Format of the Article: Any major divergence from the standard manuscript format should be indicated.
- Technical Presentation: The research article should be technically presented instead of being presented as a story. Mere repetition of past work should not be accepted. You can look for conceptual advancement over previously published work. Any major omission of the previously published findings on the similar problem must be checked.
- Interpretation of Result: The discussion should hover around the result and should not include irrelevant and unachievable statement.
- Statistical Presentation: Proper statistics should be applied over the data wherever found necessary.
- Plagiarism of Data: Data showing any type of suspicion, duplication and manipulation must be brought to the notice of the author(s).
- Summary: Pin point the strength and weakness of the article considering potential importance of the work in the context of present and future.
- Conclusion: At the end reviewer(s) can recommend necessary corrections needed to accept the paper, if they are actually required, else recommend it for publication. If found unsuitable the paper should be declared as unacceptable for publication.
The journal employs the double-blind peer review process, where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process.
The UNIverse Journal - an eJournal of Literature in English is a peer-refereed Open access e-journal checks plagiarism after submission and before starting review.The manuscripts or papers in which the plagiarism is detected are handled based on the extent of the plagiarism.
<5-10% Plagiarism: The manuscript can be considered if references are mentioned.
10- 30% Plagiarism: The manuscript will be sent back to author for content revision.
>30% Plagiarism: The manuscript will be rejected without the review. The authors are advised to revise the manuscript and resubmit the manuscript.
If plagiarism is found before the publication. The journal shall reject the papers and if after publication; the ISSN NO and other relevant reorganization shall be reverted and the original author will be free to take appropriate actions.
Plagiarism misrepresents ideas, words, and other creative expression as one’s own. Plagiarism represents the violation of copyright law. Plagiarism appears in various forms.
Copying the same content from the other source. Purposely using portions of another author’s paper or content.
Copying elements of another author’s paper, such as figures, tables, equations or illustrations that are not common knowledge, or copying or purposely using sentences without citing the source.
Using exact text downloaded from the internet.
Copying or downloading figures, photographs, pictures or diagrams without acknowledging your sources.
Manuscripts submitted to the journal must be checked for originality using anti-plagiarism software.
You may check your works before submitting on the website.
Submissions to be forwarded at firstname.lastname@example.org with subject “genre-title-author name” in ALL CAPS accordingly.
The UNIverse Journal